The film festival used the photographer's work without permission. But the court did not see any copyright infringement in this

The film festival used the photographer's work without permission. But the court did not see any copyright infringement in this

Categories: Culture

The organizers of the Northern Virginia Film Festival found a photo on the Internet and used it without the author's permission. Photographer Russell Brammer, of course, did not like it, and he sued the film festival. However, the court's decision did not please the photographer.

The film festival used the photographer's work without permission. But the court did not see any copyright infringement in this

The film festival used the photographer's work without permission. But the court did not see any copyright infringement in this

The copyright fight began when photographer Russell Brammer discovered that one of his photographs taken in Washington had been cropped and used on the website of the Northern Virginia Film Festival.

Brammer turned to the organizers of the festival and asked to remove the photo from the site. The organizers granted the request and the picture was deleted. But it didn't seem enough to the photographer. He decided to sue the organizers of the festival so that they would pay him compensation.

The film festival used the photographer's work without permission. But the court did not see any copyright infringement in this

Note that in the USA there is such a thing as "fair use" (fair use), which refers to copyright law. If certain conditions are met, you can use someone else's work, and it will not be a violation of the law. The judge concluded that Brammer's photo was used for non-commercial purposes and was only informative, besides, the organizers found the picture on the Internet and thought that it was in the public domain. The court proved that the use of the photo did not harm Brammer's commercial activities. As a result, the photographer's claim was rejected and he did not receive any compensation.

The court's decision caused controversy. Stephen Carlyle, a copyright specialist at Nova Southern University, said the court's decision could "seriously undermine the copyright protection that is provided to photographers."

This opinion was supported by lawyer David Kluft.

Keywords: Law | Court | Photographer | Photography

Post News Article

Recent articles

The History of Crash Test Dummies — Volunteers, Dead People and Pigs
The History of Crash Test Dummies — Volunteers, Dead People ...

As you know, the car is a source of increased danger. The first victim of a car accident is considered to be an Irish woman ...

Beauties on duty: 25 athletic girls in uniform and without it
Beauties on duty: 25 athletic girls in uniform and without it

Whatever they say, but the uniform, no matter military, police, flight or railway, transforms a person, making him more solid and ...

One day in the life of Ancient Greece
One day in the life of Ancient Greece

Children run naked in physical education, a woman watches the world through the window of a gynecologist, a man — at a hetaera or ...

Related articles

Ordinary Italians through the eyes of an Italian
Ordinary Italians through the eyes of an Italian

Photographer Giancarlo Rado has been photographing ordinary people of Italy for three years — musicians, shepherds, bakers, ...

Scandal and peace: the life of Mike Tyson to candid photos of Michael Brennan
Scandal and peace: the life of Mike Tyson to candid photos of ...

Mike Tyson knows how to surprise not only in the ring but also outside it. The life of the legendary boxer is in full swing. ...

Classic Nude from the photographer Rutger ten Broek
Classic Nude from the photographer Rutger ten Broek

Fascination with the female form, surrounded by nature and emotional connection between them is a Central theme of photographer. ...